Bundism is the Jewish National Liberation Movement.
Zionism is in the way of that.
I am going to explain Maoism-Bundism.
But before I explain Marxism-Leninism-Maoism-Bundism, the reader should read this https://maoismbundism.blogspot.com/2022/04/marxism-leninism-bundism-maoism.html first.
Maoism is a continuity and rupture within Marxism-Leninism. Marxism was a theory which identified the structures of class division. Marxism is also the Ideology started by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. As impressive as this Theory was, it was very eurocentric. All of those calling themselves Marxists following after with very few exceptions were Revisionists who deodorized Marxism. Vladimir Lenin was the truest Marxist because he gave correct Praxis to this Theory. After the death of Vladimir Lenin, several opportunists would lay claim to being Leninists. Fortunately the Proletariat backed the only living Bolshevik left who was a true disciple of Vladimir Lenin. This disciple was none other than Joseph Stalin. The Aristocracy backed Leon Trotsky. Had it not been for the Vanguard measures of Vladimir Lenin, it is safe to say that the Aristocracy would have destroyed the Revolution and Leon Trotsky would have destroyed everything the Bolsheviks worked so hard to create. Joseph Stalin was essential, he coined the term Marxism-Leninism and he kept Vladimir Lenin's logic in theory and praxis alive. After the death of Joseph Stalin the USSR went cold, then a Trotskyist pretending to be a Marxist-Leninist by the name of Nikita Khrushchev destroyed everything. Nikita Khrushchev turned the Soviet Union into a Dictatorship of the Aristocracy in class collaboration with the Proletariat. This is why Mao Zedong denounced Nikita Khrushchev. Mao Zedong rejected Trotskyism. Many get upset with the idea that Nikita Khrushchev was upholding the Social Fascist ideology of Trotskyism, but those upset with this never provide any genuine counter. This is also when the Social Imperialism of Russia begins. Nikita Khrushchev bankrolled the Marxist-Leninist Revolutions for the glory of Russia. He was not doing anything out of love for the Revolution. Mao Zedong on the other hand would promote mutual aid. In retrospect this has shown to be the correct way. Lin Biao and the Black Panther Party is where Maoism came from. Maoism is not Mao Zedong Thought. Unfortunately the very word Maoism was a nebulous term which many opportunists tried to claim. It was not until the 1980s that Marxism-Leninism-Maoism was declared. By the early 1990s the Revolutionary Internationalist Movement universally declared the synthesized theory of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism which the enthusiasm of those upholding this theory would slowly die down. In recent years the enthusiasm of Marxist-Leninist-Maoists has picked up again with even greater resolve.
The rivalry between the Bolsheviks and the Bundists was a major mistake.
The Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks had one major agreement before their full split. That agreement was to expel the Jewish Bund. This is because Vladimir Lenin had a chauvinistic side to him. Despite the fact that the Bolsheviks had much more in common with the Bundists, they decided to join with the Mensheviks against the Bundists. That terrible decision was the will of Vladimir Lenin. Yes, there was both Aristocrats and Proletarians within the Jewish Bund. But the Bolsheviks also had both Aristocrats and Proletarians within their ranks. In fact it was the Bolsheviks who had more Aristocrats while the Bund had far less of that. Leon Trotsky in an opportunistic move decided to sit with the Bund over the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks. Leon Trotsky was never a friend to Bundism. He would of course claim to be a Bundist later on. But he also had said he was half Menshevik and half Bolshevik at other times. The reason why the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks would join against the Bund was because they both embraced the Nation-State while Bundists rejected this. It is also important to know that the Bundists were friendly with Anarchists not Leon Trotsky. The Anarchists at the time had the same issue that both Bolsheviks and the Bundists had - too many Aristocrats with power. The Mensheviks however had their ranks filled with mostly Aristocrats and Petite bourgeoisie Social Democrats, very few Proletarians. It was not Joseph Stalin who had strife with the idea of Bundism, no that was Vladimir Lenin. Vladimir Lenin was guilty of grooming many of the Bolsheviks especially Joseph Stalin. Joseph Stalin was always sympathetic to Jews, but he was ridiculously uncultured on Jewish matters. Vladimir Lenin tasked Joseph Stalin with writing Marxism and The National Question which made good contributions yet it fails to truly escape the Nation-State theory. After the Holocaust, Joseph Stalin decided to endorse Zionism. He would later self criticize and he tried to fix this by setting up the Jewish Oblast. The majority of the Jews who would build the Yiddishkeit Culture of the Oblast were Bundists, Vladimir Lenin must have been screaming treason from the grave given how much this was not the Marxist-Leninist thing to do. But in retrospect, this is was the Marxist-Leninist-Maoist thing to do.
Marxism-Leninism-Maoism-Bundism
Marxism-Leninism-Maoism-Bundism is the synthesizing of the theories of the Jewish Bundist Diaspora Movement with Marxism-Leninism-Maoism. Maoism-Bundism aim at putting an end to Nation-States in favor of Federated-States and in some cases even Democratic Federations. Maoism-Bundism fully endorses the building of New Afrika. Securing the plans of National-Cultural Autonomy with the theories of Shtetl Security and Intercommunal Doikeit is an essential part of Maoism-Bundism.
I am tired too. I can tell Dr. Weizfeld is not yet tired, this gives me a sort of peace of mind.
The Jewish Black Panther Bund will uplift the legacy of Kushafra. Kushafra is an actual word referring to the West African Jews. There is a collaborated effort by many Ashkenazim to remove the historical legacy of Kushafra away from Jewish Collective Memory, I will not let this happen. Black New Afrikan Jews and Afrikan Jews both are misrepresented more than any other Jews in the World.
...
ReplyDeleteThe basin in which Us Imperialism is swimming is evaporating and its spasms of war as it is limited in its reach is as spectacular as Afghanistan. The state of irrationality following is destabilizing in the midst of the uncontrolled pandemic. Now is the time needed to make the change and yet we are only getting prepared before the alternatives presented by Rosa Luxembourg 'Socialism or Barbarism'.
...
ReplyDeleteThe analysis is so well presented to explain the commonality of both the Mensheviks and the Iskra/Bolsheviks operating on the basis of the bourgeois nation-state as an organizational principle innate to the party formation as replica of the very State that it seeks to do away with - good luck kid.
The lessons of the Chinese revolutions are studies that i have loved to pursue and have read most of Mao but Chen Tu-tsu as well from the second civil war of 1937-38, at the turning point for the revolution which remained subordinate to the bourgeois Kwamingtan (sic) party which at that pint killed the urban communists off for the entire generation until 1949. This point was the culmination of the Permanent Revolution predicted by Bronstein's elaboration in his analysis of the Chinese Revolution in 'Results & Prospects: The Permanent Revolution' to critique the failure of 1937. But it was Mao who organized the alternative force to the nascent urban working class in favour of the mass mobilisation of the peasantry to fulfill the objection of the socialist revolution. The traces of the previous Popular National Front are found on the flag with the 4 stars representing now the 4 Classes, including the national bourgeoisie who are tied to the US imperialist bourgeoisie. This Mao correctly named the Comprador bourgeoisie. Evidently the socialist revolution has yet to be completed, but it has been begun. We need to reach the allies inside China and not just HK.
Together with this historic contribution of the Maoist revolution there is the derivative which i have larned wince the time that I have come to hear out what Jason Unruhe has taught me about ThirdWorldism as not only the subject of an academic theory but the actual vanguard of the World revolution, and is this not what has been meant by internationalism all along!
...
ReplyDeleteYes, i can see how Stalin was framed into a Bolshevik party organizer by Lenin and tutored in theory of national self-determination even while building a Nation-State together with Lenin. Trotsky/Bronstein was actually the perfect Bolshevik when he wrote the blueprint for what he later denounced as Stalinism even though he wrote 'The New Course' & 'Terrorism and Communism', as military manuals. However Stalin continued to use such Martial Law continuously. I know this because my father was there as a refugee, subject to labour conscription for the State Martial Law. This was ok with him, Chiel Wajsfeld from Poland, as that was the deal at the border when he walked across and he asked to find work in Russia. He was let in as labour but not as a Jewish refugee from Nazi occupation, most likely due to the Treaty with Nazi Germany. So one day while working he had an injured foot and went to the doctor for treatment. But the doctor under Martial Law said that if he could have come to meet this doctor then he could have gone to work. The doctor refused him a note of excuse for absence. On returning to work the next day he was arrested for the lack of a note from the doctor by the Jewish Woman Bolshevik who headed the local 'soviet'. After 6 months in prison my father told his story and the judge acquitted him and gave him an exemption form forced labour. He then continued on by doing underground economy trading. So the State ended up losing 6 months of labour for the sake of 1 day of labour and then gained a personal enterprise economy in competition as well. This is what i've learned about Stalinism or the Party State.
Beautiful prose in a space far beyond the present possibilities in this rotting corpse of what is called the civilized world centered in Europe of course.
ReplyDeleteThis is precisely the wonderful creative writing of Comrade #13 that is the essential contribution to be made at this time.